Australians Locked Up Like Criminals Over COVID - No Freedom of Speech

An open letter from an Ex Australian Health Worker.

Prior to the CDC changing the definition of "Vaccine" it was widely understood that vaccines provide immunity against one or several diseases. Keep this in mind as you read through the letter below. 

Vaccine (noun)

A substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.

Vaccine (noun)

a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.

The COVID came along and the CDC found out the COVID "vaccines" do not provide immunity. So they changed the definition of both vaccine and vaccination.

Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.” 

The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

Dear Fellow Australians,

When we look back at this chapter in history, how will we be able to reconcile with ourselves that we didn’t speak up in times of injustice?

I am a (former) Australian health worker who has recently quit my profession so I can speak up.

Right now, a vast number of Australians are being coerced into taking the COVID-19 vaccine.

The government tells us if we don’t take the vaccine, despite any legitimate concerns we may have, there are repercussions.

• We are pushed out of our jobs.
• We are barred from taking part in society.
• We are attacked by the police "for our health".

Besides the few who can work remotely, many other areas of work are directly affected: people working in healthcare, education, law enforcement, the construction industry, the hospitality industry, aviation ... the list goes on.

Vaccine passports and mandates are simply an underhanded method of coercing a population into taking vaccines. The programs were designed to create a strong atmosphere of discrimination while providing a peculiar incentive to take the vaccine not only for our health, but to also re-gain privileges in society.

A person’s vaccine status tells very little, and it’s being used to disproportionately affect every aspect of everyday life.

• A person’s vaccine status does not reflect health status.
• A person’s vaccine status does not distinguish between whether they’ve survived COVID or have never had the disease.
• A person’s vaccine status does not display the strength of protection they still have, since vaccine efficacy does wane with time.
• A person’s vaccine status does not take into account any of the various co-morbidities that may put an individual at heightened risk of contracting COVID.

We know the vaccine carries a variety of potential risks depending on age and various pre-existing health conditions.

Where there’s risk, there must be choice.

From the Australian Immunisation handbook: "It (the vaccine) must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.”

We have lost our ability to move freely.

We are unable to keep our jobs or go shopping in certain places.

We are being stripped of our fundamental human right to make informed choices for our health.

We have to take the jab to gain back these “freedoms”.

Coercion is not consent.

Australian medical workers are being censored by AHPRA.

When we don’t speak up, we passively surrender our rights.

People treated unfairly should be able to speak up, this is our power and God-given right to claim as we see fit.

"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begn by subduing the freeness of speech." - Benjamin Franklin.

Medical and allied health workers who disagree with the vaccine mandates are not allowed to question vaccination policies as outlined by AHPRA, the agency that regulates health practitioners across Australia. AHPRA has a policy that censors speech on COVID-19 by threatening medical workers with prosecution if they speak out of line.

As such, there is censorship happening for all Australian health workers over COVID-19, including what AHPRA may call “anti-vaccination material”.

This censorship creates a manufactured consensus over the vaccines.

The TGA, Australia’s therapeutics regulator, recently introduced new restrictions on prescribing ivermectin for COVID-19 and other off-label purposes, such that GPs (physicians) can only prescribe the ivermectin for TGA-approved conditions, which does not include COVID-19 at the moment, lest they be penalised under respective state laws.

All health care providers should have the freedom to practice without fear of retribution or censorship, and have the right to prescribe safe and effective treatments as long as the tenet of "do no harm" is observed.

We all have the right and necessity to share information, since that's how we can actually have informed consent. The problem is that no health workers can say anything out of line with AHPRA’s COVID-19 vaccination policy lest they be potentially reported, face investigation, prosecution, and lose their license to practice in their respective profession.

Why are our health practitioners being censored from engaging in open professional discourse and participating in the open exchange of ideas?

Isn’t "the scientific method" the essence of science and medicine?

Lacking the evidence that’s being censored by AHPRA, how can there be informed consent for our patients?

How can we test our knowledge?

Why are our health practitioners, who seek to care for our health, being bound by this?

Censoring health workers is unjust.

Prosecuting health workers for discussing medicine is unjust.

Revoking licenses of health workers for sharing ideas and treatment plans is unjust.

Protesting against the censorship of our medical and health workers is a righteous act and benefits humanity as a whole.

Nobody should have to break the law, but some may argue that an unjust law is no law at all.

As patients continue to be affected by the censorship of medical workers, we all have the duty to speak up.

Freedom of choice is a fundamental human right.

Freedom of speech is also a fundamental human right.

If our rights are being infringed upon and we’re not speaking up or showing any kind of resistance - peacefully - then what will we ever stand for?

For those of us who are not affected by this, how can we watch our fellow Australians be oppressed by this, be pushed out of their jobs and lose the ability to keep a roof over their heads, and not speak up to help them?

Now you know what is at stake by not standing to speak up.